Navalyze · Cruise · Ship

MSC PREZIOSA

IMO: 9595321
Type: Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship)
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.44 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Cruise Management UK Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

464

Passenger median 277 kg/nm (+67%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

392

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (−33%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Passenger median 12.9 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

179.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

34,255 t

CO₂ emitted

107,166 t

Distance sailed

73,868 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,588 h

191 days, 52% of the year

Within the cruise fleet, 2025

Set against all 202 cruise ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 405 kg/nm · median 264 (+54%)

89.6Ranks 180 of 202, lowest first416

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 13.1 (+10%)

10.8Faster than 70% of cruise ships15.5

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 365 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 521 (−30%)

303Ranks 58 of 202, lowest first1,701

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Cruise medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU10%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

15,368 t

14.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Cruise median is the middle ship of all cruise ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC PREZIOSA
Cruise median

200.0400.0600.0800.01,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC PREZIOSA
Cruise median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MSC PREZIOSA
Cruise median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−6%	−14%	+11%	−4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	+27%	+0%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	+37%	+45%	−40%	−47%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+6.1 kn	−64%	−40%	+504%	−81%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 64%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.2 kn	+48%	+11%	+160%	+604%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−3.5 kn	+23%	−4%	−93%	+33%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+1%	−6%	+9%	+3%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Cruise Management UK Ltd	28,347	89,493	69,953	4,841	14.4	405	–	–
2024	MSC Cruise Management UK Ltd	27,281	86,125	63,074	4,014	15.7	433	–	–
2023	not published	20,971	66,135	49,670	3,033	16.4	422	–	–
2022	not published	25,528	79,923	82,751	5,339	15.5	309	–	–
2021	not published	11,622	36,421	13,707	1,463	9.4	848	–	–
2020	not published	3,017	9,414	5,278	420	12.6	572	–	–
2019	not published	34,255	107,166	73,868	4,588	16.1	464	–	–
2018	not published	30,925	96,835	67,582	3,895	17.4	458	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Cruise median	vs Cruise	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Cruise Management UK Ltd	365	521	−30%	58 of 202	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	MSC Cruise Management UK Ltd	379	618	−39%	51 of 202	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	379	625	−39%	38 of 202	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	713	831	−14%	79 of 187	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	3,687	1,315	+180%	90 of 100	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	524	1,169	−55%	22 of 100	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	392	589	−33%	41 of 177	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	379	577	−34%	22 of 153	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Cruise ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's cruise ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.