Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL NEW YORK

IMO: 9597484
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 64,406 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 81,298 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

274

Container median 178 kg/nm (+54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−44%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,736 t

CO₂ emitted

24,537 t

Distance sailed

28,260 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,321 h

97 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 242 kg/nm · median 177 (+37%)

78.8Ranks 1,581 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−28%)

7.22Ranks 771 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU46%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

7,179 t

93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,789 t

7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL NEW YORK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL NEW YORK
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL NEW YORK
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−4%	−26%	−33%	+4%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+19%	+36%	+26%	+17%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−22%	−16%	+15%	−9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+9%	+6%	+4%	+5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+14%	+2%	−53%	−2%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	+28%	+2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	6,685	20,966	27,587	2,386	11.6	242	11.8	92%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	10,396	32,496	41,033	2,736	15.0	253	11.4	95%
2023	not published	6,917	21,667	32,569	2,470	13.2	212	9.70	94%
2022	not published	7,736	24,537	28,260	2,321	12.2	274	10.7	93%
2021	not published	6,794	21,549	27,055	2,152	12.6	251	10.2	93%
2020	not published	12,806	40,497	58,027	4,150	14.0	221	10.4	–
2019	not published	9,837	30,820	45,195	3,157	14.3	218	10.2	97%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.8	16.3	−28%	771 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.4	17.5	−35%	557 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	9.70	19.4	−50%	365 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.7	19.1	−44%	370 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	10.2	17.9	−43%	333 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.4	17.6	−41%	408 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.2	18.9	−46%	334 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.