Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM PHOENIX

IMO: 9597501
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 86,576 t
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Wilmington
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: APL PHOENIX

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,157 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

251

Container median 172 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−34%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,903 t

CO₂ emitted

53,404 t

Distance sailed

67,257 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,380 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 225 kg/nm · median 177 (+27%)

78.8Ranks 1,440 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 13.3 (−22%)

9.1Faster than 17% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 349 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU18%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,115 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM PHOENIX
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM PHOENIX
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM PHOENIX
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.6 kn	+3%	−33%	−73%	+2%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−4%	+6%	+101%	−33%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−15%	−23%	−38%	+3%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	+11%	−7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+9%	+11%	−5%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+2%	+8%	+386%	−18%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	5,455	17,004	24,218	2,328	10.4	225	8.11	98%
2025	APL Maritime Ltd	5,455	17,004	24,218	2,328	10.4	225	8.11	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	19,183	59,809	88,170	5,499	16.0	218	7.95	97%
2023	not published	9,926	31,072	43,832	3,032	14.5	227	11.9	95%
2022	not published	18,858	59,558	70,950	4,451	15.9	266	11.6	97%
2021	not published	17,611	55,586	64,115	4,098	15.6	275	12.5	97%
2020	not published	16,903	53,404	67,257	4,380	15.4	251	11.7	–
2019	not published	3,419	10,676	13,827	958	14.4	247	14.2	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	APL Maritime Ltd	8.11	16.3	−50%	349 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	7.95	17.5	−55%	263 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	11.9	19.4	−39%	532 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.6	19.1	−39%	451 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.5	17.9	−30%	502 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.7	17.6	−34%	485 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.2	18.9	−25%	581 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.