Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL SAVANNAH

IMO: 9597513
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 68,295 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 9.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,114 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

227

Container median 174 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−47%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,868 t

CO₂ emitted

40,234 t

Distance sailed

56,815 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,965 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 251 kg/nm · median 177 (+42%)

78.8Ranks 1,660 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 52% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 737 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU52%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

12,405 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,473 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL SAVANNAH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL SAVANNAH
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL SAVANNAH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+20%	+23%	+35%	+20%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−28%	−19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−19%	−29%	−38%	−5%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+1%	−5%	−18%	+6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+17%	+31%	+16%	+15%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+5%	+6%	+4%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	−9%	−18%	+65%	−17%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8,536	26,728	34,032	2,529	13.5	251	11.5	94%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	5,276	16,553	25,173	1,930	13.0	210	9.55	93%
2023	not published	7,877	24,459	34,859	2,597	13.4	226	11.9	96%
2022	not published	15,647	49,373	55,988	3,652	15.3	280	12.5	95%
2021	not published	18,992	59,958	68,641	4,224	16.3	277	11.8	96%
2020	not published	14,066	44,443	59,314	4,096	14.5	237	10.3	–
2019	not published	12,868	40,234	56,815	3,965	14.3	227	10.1	96%
2018	not published	8,525	26,618	34,334	2,142	16.0	248	12.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.5	16.3	−29%	737 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	9.55	17.5	−45%	418 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	11.9	19.4	−39%	528 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.5	19.1	−35%	520 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	11.8	17.9	−34%	452 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.3	17.6	−42%	395 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.1	18.9	−47%	329 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.2	20.2	−40%	394 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.