Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL MIAMI

IMO: 9597549
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 50,765 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,765 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

179.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−33%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,698 t

CO₂ emitted

14,641 t

14,872 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,219 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,133 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 179.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+1%)

78.8Ranks 1,119 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 34% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−33%)

7.22Ranks 689 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU36%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,258 t).

Fuel burned laden

86%

14% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

APL MIAMI
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL MIAMI
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL MIAMI
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−31%	−46%	+136%	+7%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+7%	+20%	−79%	−2%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−9%	−17%	−18%	−1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+6%	+1%	−5%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+1.0 kn	−10%	−4%	+651%	−20%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−10%	−11%	−84%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	4,698	14,641	26,219	2,133	12.3	179.2	11.00	86%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	2,875	8,968	11,133	707	15.7	258.3	10.30	96%
2023	not published	12,826	38,773	53,120	3,785	14.0	241.5	10.50	96%
2022	not published	17,057	53,857	64,552	4,183	15.4	264.2	10.64	97%
2021	not published	16,959	53,557	67,766	4,191	16.2	250.3	10.23	96%
2019	not published	2,501	7,807	9,022	594	15.2	277.2	12.76	97%
2018	not published	17,649	55,168	57,114	3,750	15.2	309.0	15.47	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.00	16.30	−33%	689 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	10.30	17.52	−41%	472 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.50	19.40	−46%	422 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.64	19.13	−44%	365 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	10.23	17.90	−43%	338 of 1,781	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.76	18.88	−32%	493 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	15.47	20.22	−23%	575 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.