Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL MIAMI

IMO: 9597549
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 50,765 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.98 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,255 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

250

Container median 186 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−43%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,959 t

CO₂ emitted

53,557 t

Distance sailed

67,766 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,191 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 179 kg/nm · median 177 (+1%)

78.8Ranks 1,119 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 34% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−33%)

7.22Ranks 689 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU25%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

16,315 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,078 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL MIAMI
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL MIAMI
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL MIAMI
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−31%	−46%	+136%	+7%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+7%	+20%	−79%	−2%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−9%	−17%	−18%	−1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+6%	+1%	−5%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+1.0 kn	−10%	−4%	+651%	−20%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−10%	−11%	−84%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	4,698	14,641	26,219	2,133	12.3	179	11.0	86%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	2,875	8,968	11,133	707	15.7	258	10.3	96%
2023	not published	12,826	38,773	53,120	3,785	14.0	242	10.5	96%
2022	not published	17,057	53,857	64,552	4,183	15.4	264	10.6	97%
2021	not published	16,959	53,557	67,766	4,191	16.2	250	10.2	96%
2019	not published	2,501	7,807	9,022	594	15.2	277	12.8	97%
2018	not published	17,649	55,168	57,114	3,750	15.2	309	15.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.0	16.3	−33%	689 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	10.3	17.5	−41%	472 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.5	19.4	−46%	422 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.6	19.1	−44%	365 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	10.2	17.9	−43%	338 of 1,781	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.8	18.9	−32%	493 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	15.5	20.2	−23%	575 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.