Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ETERNAL ACE

IMO: 9606479
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,420 t
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,420 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.7 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

66.90

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+21%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

920 t

CO₂ emitted

2,904 t

2,949 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,818 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

760 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.7 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−6%)

79.6Ranks 158 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

12.0Faster than 20% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 66.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+21%)

34.70Ranks 319 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU22%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU4%

20% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (576 t).

Fuel burned laden

76%

24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−16%	−34%	−65%	+25%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+0.1 kn	+18%	+19%	−30%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.9 kn	−13%	+16%	+177%	+22%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+41%	+40%	−15%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	605	1,901	6,047	404	15.0	100.0	51.48	95%
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	920	2,904	9,818	760	12.9	93.7	66.90	76%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	3,111	9,705	27,727	1,697	16.3	112.2	53.40	99%
2022	not published	3,753	11,839	39,474	2,431	16.2	95.1	58.47	99%
2021	not published	1,551	4,905	14,244	1,158	12.3	108.9	47.85	97%
2020	not published	1,296	4,105	16,779	1,354	12.4	77.2	72.59	90%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	66.90	55.36	+21%	319 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	53.40	55.31	−3%	157 of 335	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	58.47	57.66	+1%	241 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	47.85	59.57	−20%	112 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	72.59	57.26	+27%	315 of 449	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.