Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ETERNAL ACE

IMO: 9606479
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,420 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,129 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.1

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (+1%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,753 t

CO₂ emitted

11,839 t

Distance sailed

39,474 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,431 h

101 days, 28% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.7 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−6%)

79.6Ranks 158 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

12.0Faster than 20% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 66.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+21%)

34.7Ranks 319 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU43%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

3,708 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

143 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ETERNAL ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−16%	−34%	−65%	+25%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	+0.1 kn	+18%	+19%	−30%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.9 kn	−13%	+16%	+177%	+22%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+41%	+40%	−15%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	605	1,901	6,047	404	15.0	100	51.5	95%
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	920	2,904	9,818	760	12.9	93.7	66.9	76%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	3,111	9,705	27,727	1,697	16.3	112	53.4	99%
2022	not published	3,753	11,839	39,474	2,431	16.2	95.1	58.5	99%
2021	not published	1,551	4,905	14,244	1,158	12.3	109	47.9	97%
2020	not published	1,296	4,105	16,779	1,354	12.4	77.2	72.6	90%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	66.9	55.4	+21%	319 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	53.4	55.3	−3%	157 of 335	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	58.5	57.7	+1%	241 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	47.9	59.6	−20%	112 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	72.6	57.3	+27%	315 of 449	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.