Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SAGA FUJI

IMO: 9609457
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.04 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

94.4 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+167%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

8.42

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−67%)

Average speed

9.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,987 t

CO₂ emitted

6,255 t

6,353 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,058 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,255 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 94.4 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+167%)

17.4Ranks 2,625 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.3 kn · median 9.3 (+0%)

7.0Faster than 50% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 8.42 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−67%)

10.14Ranks 157 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU32%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU11%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,949 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SAGA FUJI
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAGA FUJI
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SAGA FUJI
General cargo median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.5 kn	+21%	−4%	+55%	−18%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+7%	+18%	−3%	+16%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.4 kn	−32%	−44%	+18%	−38%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+19%	+22%	+10%	−26%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+5%	+10%	−73%	+87%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−0%	+17%	+48%	+23%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−2%	−11%	+49%	+5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,987	6,255	21,058	2,255	9.3	94.4	–	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,062	3,342	13,600	1,154	11.8	78.1	–	–
2023	not published	1,024	3,192	14,067	1,316	10.7	72.8	8.83	63%
2022	not published	1,270	4,006	11,903	910	13.1	106.7	14.13	0%
2021	not published	974	3,078	10,850	854	12.7	89.7	–	36%
2020	not published	3,497	11,065	40,855	3,360	12.2	85.6	–	78%
2019	not published	2,376	7,440	27,667	2,672	10.4	85.9	–	100%
2018	not published	1,634	5,102	18,620	1,645	11.3	87.7	–	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	8.42	25.45	−67%	157 of 2,706	DNV	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	10.28	19.25	−47%	263 of 1,111	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	8.83	93.54	−91%	3 of 116	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	14.13	74.09	−81%	9 of 78	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	18.97	22.70	−16%	393 of 1,142	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.16	24.50	−59%	95 of 1,167	ABS	C
2019	not published	8.26	24.96	−67%	40 of 1,154	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.89	24.89	−68%	39 of 1,044	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.