Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PATAGONIA

IMO: 9611280
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,137 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD · part of Nordic Hamburg

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,137 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

73.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+222%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

345 t

CO₂ emitted

1,087 t

1,104 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,678 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

456 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−11%)

61.0Ranks 1,119 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.7 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 35% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+222%)

4.80Ranks 3,448 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU71%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PATAGONIA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PATAGONIA
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PATAGONIA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−8%	−14%	−75%	+172%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+11%	+22%	−21%	+23%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+7%	−4%	+598%	−24%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−17%	−23%	−80%	+22%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−2%	+9%	+380%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	–	–	–	–	–

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	345	1,087	4,678	456	10.3	73.8	25.44	–
2025	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	345	1,087	4,678	456	10.3	73.8	25.44	–
2024	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	1,488	4,688	18,641	1,695	11.0	79.8	9.37	83%
2023	not published	1,710	5,398	23,670	2,368	10.0	72.2	7.59	–
2022	not published	229	727	3,390	305	11.1	67.5	10.02	–
2021	not published	1,418	4,487	17,366	1,456	11.9	81.7	8.18	–
2020	not published	301	954	3,619	338	10.7	83.2	9.63	–
2019	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	Nordic Hamburg Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	25.44	7.89	+222%	3,448 of 3,610	DNV	A
2024	NORDIC HAMBURG SHIPMGMT HK LTD	9.37	8.09	+16%	1,965 of 3,089	ABS	–
2023	not published	7.59	8.27	−8%	1,483 of 3,548	EnvService	B
2022	not published	10.02	8.71	+15%	2,484 of 3,968	EnvService	B
2021	not published	8.18	8.57	−5%	1,535 of 3,466	EnvService	B
2020	not published	9.63	8.24	+17%	2,066 of 3,150	EnvService	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.