Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CORAL ENERGY

IMO: 9617698
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

73.8 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

27.60

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+288%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,316 t

CO₂ emitted

16,932 t

22,436 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

85,578 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,089 h

254 days, 70% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.8 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−61%)

152.1Ranks 9 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

11.2Faster than 41% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 27.60 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+288%)

5.06Ranks 363 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

87% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,809 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

190.1 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.325

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+30%	+34%	−8%	+34%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	−27%	−9%	+21%	−25%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+4%	−13%	−11%	−19%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+41%	+46%	+231%	−57%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.2 kn	−32%	−24%	+15%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	6,316	16,932	85,578	6,089	14.1	73.8	–	–
2024LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	5,675	15,286	84,629	6,095	13.9	67.1	–	–
2023LNG	not published	4,722	13,040	91,684	6,775	13.5	51.5	–	–
2022LNG	not published	5,362	14,924	76,067	7,033	10.8	70.5	–	–
2021LNG	not published	5,742	15,868	85,008	6,571	12.9	67.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	1,226	3,474	25,679	2,049	12.5	47.8	74.06	–
2018LNG	not published	1,570	4,367	22,339	1,980	11.3	70.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	27.60	7.12	+288%	363 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	25.98	7.39	+252%	294 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG	not published	19.43	9.10	+114%	325 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG	not published	26.03	10.38	+151%	339 of 379	DNV	B
2021LNG	not published	32.16	10.46	+207%	275 of 289	DNV	B
2020LNG	not published	74.06	42.29	+75%	242 of 339	DNV	B
2018LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.