Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CORAL ENERGY

IMO: 9617698
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

70.5

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−72%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

26.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+151%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,362 t

CO₂ emitted

14,924 t

Distance sailed

76,067 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,033 h

293 days, 80% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.8 kg/nm · median 190 (−61%)

152Ranks 9 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

11.2Faster than 41% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 27.6 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+288%)

5.06Ranks 363 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU29%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

863 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CORAL ENERGY
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+30%	+34%	−8%	+34%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	−27%	−9%	+21%	−25%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+4%	−13%	−11%	−19%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+41%	+46%	+231%	−57%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.2 kn	−32%	−24%	+15%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	6,316	16,932	85,578	6,089	14.1	73.8	–	–
2024LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	5,675	15,286	84,629	6,095	13.9	67.1	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4,722	13,040	91,684	6,775	13.5	51.5	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,362	14,924	76,067	7,033	10.8	70.5	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5,742	15,868	85,008	6,571	12.9	67.5	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	1,226	3,474	25,679	2,049	12.5	47.8	74.1	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1,570	4,367	22,339	1,980	11.3	70.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	27.6	7.12	+288%	363 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	26.0	7.39	+252%	294 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	19.4	9.10	+114%	325 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	26.0	10.4	+151%	339 of 379	DNV	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	32.2	10.5	+207%	275 of 289	DNV	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	74.1	42.3	+75%	242 of 339	DNV	B
2018LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.