Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAJESTIC MAERSK

IMO: 9619919
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 152,255 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 154,135 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

301

Container median 174 kg/nm (+73%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−68%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,735 t

CO₂ emitted

64,580 t

Distance sailed

68,799 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,299 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 319 kg/nm · median 177 (+80%)

78.8Ranks 2,060 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 13.3 (+25%)

9.1Faster than 95% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−60%)

7.22Ranks 124 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU45%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

20,735 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,272 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAJESTIC MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAJESTIC MAERSK
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAJESTIC MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	−43%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+2%	+12%	+44%	+2%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−7%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−5%	−10%	−5%	+5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	+45%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+10%	+11%	−31%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−4%	−11%	−13%	−8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	16,089	50,110	50,478	3,045	16.6	319	6.52	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	28,974	90,246	87,977	5,403	16.3	329	6.12	98%
2023	not published	19,713	61,402	61,275	4,132	14.8	322	6.00	99%
2022	not published	21,418	66,805	66,096	4,397	15.0	324	6.48	98%
2021	not published	23,577	73,444	69,447	4,377	15.9	340	6.18	–
2020	not published	15,912	48,292	47,798	2,968	16.1	333	6.24	100%
2019	not published	20,735	64,580	68,799	4,299	16.0	301	6.09	100%
2018	not published	24,806	77,425	79,288	4,562	17.4	313	6.59	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.52	16.3	−60%	124 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.12	17.5	−65%	75 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.00	19.4	−69%	57 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.48	19.1	−66%	82 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	6.18	17.9	−65%	75 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.24	17.6	−65%	97 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.09	18.9	−68%	43 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.59	20.2	−67%	27 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.