Navalyze · Container · Ship

MATZ MAERSK

IMO: 9619983
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 145,982 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Mogeltonder
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 157,579 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

319

Container median 182 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−69%)

Average speed

17.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

135.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

25,464 t

CO₂ emitted

79,453 t

Distance sailed

79,780 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,524 h

189 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 315 kg/nm · median 177 (+78%)

78.8Ranks 2,049 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−59%)

7.22Ranks 157 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU43%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

25,464 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,263 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MATZ MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MATZ MAERSK
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MATZ MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−8%	−6%	−5%	+9%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	+2%	+14%	+87%	−1%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+5.0 kn	+1%	+58%	+202%	−18%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−1%	−0%	−27%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	+11%	−21%	−18%	+20%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−3.6 kn	−3%	−25%	−38%	+12%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−2%	−10%	−67%	+3%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	16,549	51,532	52,530	3,302	15.9	315	6.72	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	18,927	58,943	55,380	3,548	15.6	342	6.14	99%
2023	not published	9,882	30,781	29,593	2,107	14.0	334	6.18	95%
2022	not published	3,240	10,130	9,793	1,089	9.0	331	7.54	87%
2021	not published	4,501	14,053	13,464	1,507	8.9	334	8.70	–
2020	not published	4,929	15,382	16,379	1,305	12.6	301	7.27	100%
2019	not published	8,288	25,454	26,626	1,642	16.2	311	6.48	100%
2018	not published	25,464	79,453	79,780	4,524	17.6	319	6.32	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.72	16.3	−59%	157 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.14	17.5	−65%	77 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.18	19.4	−68%	80 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.54	19.1	−61%	192 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.70	17.9	−51%	221 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.27	17.6	−59%	189 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.48	18.9	−66%	73 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.32	20.2	−69%	15 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.