Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAYVIEW MAERSK

IMO: 9619995
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 100,280 t
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 100,280 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

289.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+64%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−45%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,446 t

CO₂ emitted

48,121 t

48,880 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

53,319 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,435 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 289.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+64%)

78.8Ranks 1,921 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 83% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 464 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU89%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU2%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (26,253 t).

Fuel burned laden

77%

23% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.8 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	−33%	+44%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−1%	+11%	+32%	−2%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+7%	+12%	−15%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−0%	−11%	−7%	+17%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−8%	−11%	−1%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+8%	+5%	+42%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−17%	−20%	−28%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	15,446	48,121	53,319	3,435	15.5	289.7	9.00	77%
2024	Maersk A/S	25,963	80,855	80,025	4,815	16.6	324.4	6.24	99%
2023	not published	19,779	61,603	60,575	4,079	14.9	326.5	6.35	98%
2022	not published	21,595	67,250	70,951	4,973	14.3	304.4	6.82	98%
2021	not published	23,344	72,712	76,305	4,784	15.9	305.9	5.84	–
2020	not published	25,458	78,191	76,872	4,634	16.6	331.2	6.13	100%
2019	not published	16,602	51,698	54,015	3,187	17.0	307.4	6.32	100%
2018	not published	27,580	86,056	74,512	4,260	17.5	370.1	7.31	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	9.00	16.30	−45%	464 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.24	17.52	−64%	87 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.35	19.40	−67%	93 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.82	19.13	−64%	122 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	5.84	17.90	−67%	43 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.13	17.58	−65%	81 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.32	18.88	−67%	57 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.31	20.22	−64%	84 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.