Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAYVIEW MAERSK

IMO: 9619995
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 100,280 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 157,992 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

370

Container median 182 kg/nm (+104%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.31

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−64%)

Average speed

17.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

155.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

27,580 t

CO₂ emitted

86,056 t

Distance sailed

74,512 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,260 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 290 kg/nm · median 177 (+64%)

78.8Ranks 1,921 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 83% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 464 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU43%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

27,580 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,764 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAYVIEW MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	−33%	+44%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−1%	+11%	+32%	−2%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+7%	+12%	−15%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−0%	−11%	−7%	+17%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−8%	−11%	−1%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+8%	+5%	+42%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−17%	−20%	−28%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	15,446	48,121	53,319	3,435	15.5	290	9.00	77%
2024	Maersk A/S	25,963	80,855	80,025	4,815	16.6	324	6.24	99%
2023	not published	19,779	61,603	60,575	4,079	14.9	327	6.35	98%
2022	not published	21,595	67,250	70,951	4,973	14.3	304	6.82	98%
2021	not published	23,344	72,712	76,305	4,784	15.9	306	5.84	–
2020	not published	25,458	78,191	76,872	4,634	16.6	331	6.13	100%
2019	not published	16,602	51,698	54,015	3,187	17.0	307	6.32	100%
2018	not published	27,580	86,056	74,512	4,260	17.5	370	7.31	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	9.00	16.3	−45%	464 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.24	17.5	−64%	87 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.35	19.4	−67%	93 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.82	19.1	−64%	122 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	5.84	17.9	−67%	43 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.13	17.6	−65%	81 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.32	18.9	−67%	57 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.31	20.2	−64%	84 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.