Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAN LORENZO MAERSK

IMO: 9622227
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 73,794 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAP SAN LORENZO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 38,207 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

272

Container median 182 kg/nm (+50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+10%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

106.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,951 t

CO₂ emitted

65,539 t

Distance sailed

76,990 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,745 h

198 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 190 kg/nm · median 177 (+7%)

78.8Ranks 1,208 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.01 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−51%)

7.22Ranks 333 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU30%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

20,951 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,638 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAN LORENZO MAERSK
Container median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAN LORENZO MAERSK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAN LORENZO MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−47%	−4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+3.6 kn	+53%	+108%	+265%	+25%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.5 kn	−46%	−60%	−58%	−13%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 46%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+7%	+2%	−15%	−20%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	−4%	−12%	−14%	−7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−6%	−8%	−31%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−5%	−7%	+8%	−51%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	6,411	19,971	33,786	2,547	13.3	190	8.01	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	13,288	40,668	64,211	4,684	13.7	207	8.31	98%
2023	not published	2,372	7,389	17,602	1,737	10.1	135	6.64	95%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,505	24,537	42,151	3,095	13.6	249	7.64	96%
2021	not published	11,448	35,658	49,324	3,445	14.3	232	9.51	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13,859	40,044	57,504	3,668	15.7	241	10.3	100%
2019	not published	21,491	67,055	83,407	5,258	15.9	258	10.9	100%
2018	not published	20,951	65,539	76,990	4,745	16.2	272	22.3	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	8.01	16.3	−51%	333 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	8.31	17.5	−53%	300 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.64	19.4	−66%	122 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.64	19.1	−60%	195 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	9.51	17.9	−47%	287 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10.3	17.6	−42%	395 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.9	18.9	−42%	384 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	22.3	20.2	+10%	951 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.