Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK

IMO: 9622239
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 86,984 t
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAP SAN AUGUSTIN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 86,984 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

215.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−53%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,256 t

CO₂ emitted

25,715 t

26,120 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,393 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,777 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 215.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+22%)

78.8Ranks 1,376 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 300 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU41%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,505 t).

Fuel burned laden

98%

2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−41%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+5.2 kn	+46%	+130%	+421%	−9%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−6.8 kn	−34%	−63%	−78%	+20%	6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	−18%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−2%	−1%	−15%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	−1%	−53%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	8,256	25,715	38,393	2,777	13.8	215.1	7.70	98%
2024	Maersk A/S	14,780	45,502	65,318	4,674	14.0	226.3	8.75	98%
2023	not published	1,944	6,060	12,529	1,416	8.8	155.2	9.57	91%
2021LNG	not published	13,190	35,511	55,869	3,577	15.6	236.1	7.95	–
2020	not published	17,725	52,520	68,183	4,361	15.6	260.0	10.14	100%
2019	not published	21,351	66,663	80,582	5,181	15.6	265.0	11.38	100%
2018	not published	22,024	68,912	81,793	5,148	15.9	269.3	23.99	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	7.70	16.30	−53%	300 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	8.75	17.52	−50%	351 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	9.57	19.40	−51%	353 of 1,899	ABS	C
2021LNG	not published	7.95	17.90	−56%	183 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.14	17.58	−42%	388 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.38	18.88	−40%	418 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	23.99	20.22	+19%	1,011 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.