Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK

IMO: 9622239
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 86,984 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAP SAN AUGUSTIN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 75,964 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

260

Container median 172 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−42%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,725 t

CO₂ emitted

52,520 t

Distance sailed

68,183 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,361 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 215 kg/nm · median 177 (+22%)

78.8Ranks 1,376 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 300 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU30%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

17,725 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,549 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAN AUGUSTIN MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−5%	−6%	−41%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+5.2 kn	+46%	+130%	+421%	−9%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−6.8 kn	−34%	−63%	−78%	+20%	6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	−18%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−2%	−1%	−15%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−2%	−4%	−1%	−53%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	8,256	25,715	38,393	2,777	13.8	215	7.70	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	14,780	45,502	65,318	4,674	14.0	226	8.75	98%
2023	not published	1,944	6,060	12,529	1,416	8.8	155	9.57	91%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,190	35,511	55,869	3,577	15.6	236	7.95	–
2020	not published	17,725	52,520	68,183	4,361	15.6	260	10.1	100%
2019	not published	21,351	66,663	80,582	5,181	15.6	265	11.4	100%
2018	not published	22,024	68,912	81,793	5,148	15.9	269	24.0	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	7.70	16.3	−53%	300 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	8.75	17.5	−50%	351 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	9.57	19.4	−51%	353 of 1,899	ABS	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.95	17.9	−56%	183 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.1	17.6	−42%	388 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.4	18.9	−40%	418 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	24.0	20.2	+19%	1,011 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.