Navalyze · Container · Ship

SAN RAPHAEL MAERSK

IMO: 9622253
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 77,510 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAP SAN RAPHAEL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 75,662 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

249

Container median 172 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−43%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,757 t

CO₂ emitted

48,010 t

Distance sailed

63,390 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,110 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 177 (+15%)

78.8Ranks 1,294 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 353 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU27%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

15,757 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,493 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SAN RAPHAEL MAERSK
Container median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAN RAPHAEL MAERSK
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAN RAPHAEL MAERSK
Container median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	−7%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.8 kn	+54%	+114%	+268%	+28%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	−41%	−58%	−63%	+17%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+7%	−3%	−5%	−23%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−9%	−11%	−25%	−20%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	+1%	−9%	−30%	−17%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−19%	−12%	+17%	−59%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	11,694	36,414	57,502	4,232	13.6	203	8.17	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	13,634	42,264	61,955	4,596	13.5	220	9.25	98%
2023	not published	2,404	7,570	16,849	1,738	9.7	143	7.20	94%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,022	19,274	45,498	3,350	13.6	242	6.16	97%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,794	30,197	47,812	3,179	15.0	226	7.98	–
2020	not published	15,757	48,010	63,390	4,110	15.4	249	10.0	100%
2019	not published	22,393	70,065	90,551	5,327	17.0	247	12.0	100%
2018	not published	23,622	73,958	77,725	4,960	15.7	304	29.7	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	8.17	16.3	−50%	353 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	9.25	17.5	−47%	395 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.20	19.4	−63%	175 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.16	19.1	−68%	47 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.98	17.9	−55%	187 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.0	17.6	−43%	372 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.0	18.9	−36%	449 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	29.7	20.2	+47%	1,159 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.