Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TOKYO

IMO: 9629380
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,728 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TOKYO BAY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,728 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

179.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−36%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,029 t

CO₂ emitted

28,447 t

28,891 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

50,426 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,378 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 179.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+1%)

78.8Ranks 1,119 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−36%)

7.22Ranks 625 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU44%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU7%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,190 t).

Fuel burned laden

93%

7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM TOKYO
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TOKYO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TOKYO
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+5%	−9%	+255%	−47%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−6%	−14%	−58%	+41%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−8%	−17%	−21%	+19%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	+6%	−4%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.8 kn	+18%	+43%	+269%	+11%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	9,029	28,447	50,426	4,378	11.5	179.1	10.50	93%
2024part-year	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	742	2,313	5,166	301	17.2	143.6	–	100%
2024	CMA CGM SA	2,415	7,588	14,224	1,060	13.4	169.8	19.80	91%
2023	not published	6,123	19,183	33,971	2,317	14.7	180.3	14.02	88%
2022	not published	8,446	26,404	42,983	2,662	16.1	196.5	11.77	92%
2021	not published	8,565	26,765	40,558	2,565	15.8	211.2	12.30	89%
2020	not published	1,972	6,155	10,992	845	13.0	179.4	11.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	10.50	16.30	−36%	625 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	CMA CGM SA	19.80	17.52	+13%	1,127 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	14.02	19.40	−28%	680 of 1,899	ABS	A
2022	not published	11.77	19.13	−38%	467 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.30	17.90	−31%	486 of 1,781	ABS	A
2020	not published	11.07	17.58	−37%	444 of 1,797	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.