Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.
Ships18
CO₂ emitted288 kt
Fuel per mile140 kg/nm
Average speed14.6 kn
CO₂ at berth4.3%
Ships burning LNG9
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.12.7 (−27%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.712.7−27%19714.73,2795.0%–
Segment median 17.50%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

  • EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.52.3 (−6%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.1152.3−6%9814.62,3983.0%9
Segment median 55.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.ABS (18)100%33%0%0%

EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LAKE TAUPOLNG9289908Vehicle carrier83.0 g CO₂/t·nm73.3+13%13.416,007 t€243k
LAKE GENEVA9713882Vehicle carrier48.4 g CO₂/t·nm45.6+6%14.41,717 t€29k
LAKE WANAKALNG9432892Vehicle carrier70.7 g CO₂/t·nm73.3−4%14.015,602 t€239k
LAKE ANNECYLNG9946063Vehicle carrier52.3 g CO₂/t·nm55.3−6%17.114,328 t€250k
LAKE COMOLNG9432919Vehicle carrier147 g CO₂/t·nm158−7%15.04,167 t€66k
LAKE HERMANLNG9953119Vehicle carrier67.1 g CO₂/t·nm73.3−8%16.28,934 t€148k
CMA CGM MONZALNG9953808Vehicle carrier34.5 g CO₂/t·nm38.0−9%16.14,716 t€74k
CMA CGM IMAGINATION9948231Container12.9 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−11%14.431,230 t€681k
CMA CGM HARMONY9952828Container12.8 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−12%14.812,715 t€285k
CMA CGM BETTER WAYS9950557Container12.8 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−12%14.540,626 t€915k
CMA CGM MONACOLNG9946075Vehicle carrier33.4 g CO₂/t·nm38.0−12%15.88,906 t€156k
CMA CGM EXEMPLARITY9948229Container12.6 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−13%14.333,437 t€736k
CMA CGM SILVERSTONELNG9953793Vehicle carrier32.8 g CO₂/t·nm38.0−14%15.94,042 t€62k
CMA CGM EXCELLENCE9948217Container12.3 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−15%15.040,215 t€902k
CMA CGM BOLDNESS9948243Container12.3 g CO₂/t·nm14.5−15%15.519,262 t€427k
CMA CGM INDIANAPOLISLNG9953717Vehicle carrier32.9 g CO₂/t·nm45.6−28%15.38,474 t€140k
LAKE KIVU9308792Vehicle carrier110 g CO₂/t·nm158−31%12.721,321 t€370k

30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.