Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL TEMASEK

IMO: 9631955
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 116,221 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 139,941 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

351

Container median 186 kg/nm (+89%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.85

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−56%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

120.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,056 t

CO₂ emitted

28,324 t

Distance sailed

25,783 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,805 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 305 kg/nm · median 177 (+72%)

78.8Ranks 2,000 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 355 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU13%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

8,476 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,852 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL TEMASEK
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL TEMASEK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL TEMASEK
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	−29%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−8%	+7%	+225%	+1%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+4.4 kn	−6%	+35%	+140%	−27%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.2 kn	−2%	−30%	−52%	+45%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+45%	+42%	−41%	+63%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	−24%	−33%	−32%	−18%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−14%	−19%	+165%	−38%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	21,064	65,645	69,050	4,292	16.1	305	8.18	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	29,338	91,423	97,643	5,822	16.8	301	8.42	98%
2023	not published	9,749	30,429	30,009	2,069	14.5	325	8.36	94%
2022	not published	4,314	13,500	12,495	1,237	10.1	345	11.4	91%
2021	not published	9,056	28,324	25,783	1,805	14.3	351	7.85	94%
2020	not published	10,666	33,588	43,932	3,016	14.6	243	4.82	–
2019	not published	20,541	64,098	64,367	3,883	16.6	319	5.89	98%
2018	not published	8,998	28,112	24,262	1,381	17.6	371	9.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.18	16.3	−50%	355 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.42	17.5	−52%	318 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.36	19.4	−57%	270 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.4	19.1	−41%	436 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	7.85	17.9	−56%	180 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	4.82	17.6	−73%	9 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.89	18.9	−69%	27 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	9.50	20.2	−53%	225 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.