Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL RAFFLES

IMO: 9631979
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 92,705 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 123,033 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

286

Container median 165 kg/nm (+73%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.24

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−63%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,495 t

CO₂ emitted

57,706 t

Distance sailed

64,783 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,458 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 282 kg/nm · median 177 (+59%)

78.8Ranks 1,870 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 78% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.51 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−42%)

7.22Ranks 521 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU27%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

17,589 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,885 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL RAFFLES
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL RAFFLES
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL RAFFLES
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	−35%	+33%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+4%	+12%	+32%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.3 kn	−37%	−25%	+230%	−38%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	+42%	+18%	−47%	+47%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 42%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−1%	−9%	+0%	+33%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+4%	+8%	−32%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+1%	−4%	+12%	−16%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	15,546	48,654	55,187	3,665	15.1	282	9.51	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	25,443	79,430	85,473	5,494	15.6	298	7.14	98%
2023	not published	18,495	57,706	64,783	4,458	14.5	286	7.24	95%
2022	not published	8,900	27,903	19,614	1,610	12.2	454	11.7	99%
2021	not published	11,848	37,024	37,180	2,519	14.8	319	7.91	97%
2020	not published	11,897	37,324	37,039	2,294	16.1	321	5.93	–
2019	not published	16,737	52,283	54,421	3,483	15.6	308	5.97	96%
2018	not published	14,751	46,019	48,449	2,952	16.4	305	7.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	9.51	16.3	−42%	521 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	7.14	17.5	−59%	172 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.24	19.4	−63%	180 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.7	19.1	−39%	460 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	7.91	17.9	−56%	182 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.93	17.6	−66%	61 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.97	18.9	−68%	34 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.12	20.2	−65%	68 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.