Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL CHANGI

IMO: 9631981
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 109,593 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 171,740 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

301

Container median 174 kg/nm (+73%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.47

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−71%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

117.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,757 t

CO₂ emitted

49,153 t

Distance sailed

52,323 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,215 h

134 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 285 kg/nm · median 177 (+61%)

78.8Ranks 1,897 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 349 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU13%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

15,363 t

98% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,258 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL CHANGI
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL CHANGI
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL CHANGI
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.3 kn	−8%	−21%	−6%	−1%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+11%	+28%	+13%	+12%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−16%	−4%	+126%	−25%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	−9%	−22%	+75%	+6%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+11%	+7%	−66%	+48%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+9%	+3%	−1%	+14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−6%	−7%	+36%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	21,239	66,184	74,464	5,252	14.2	285	8.11	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	24,442	76,158	78,853	4,778	16.5	310	8.22	99%
2023	not published	19,379	60,412	69,573	4,828	14.4	279	7.34	96%
2022	not published	10,174	31,787	30,820	2,432	12.7	330	9.78	96%
2021	not published	6,410	20,101	17,652	1,190	14.8	363	9.22	90%
2020	not published	17,035	53,405	51,909	3,377	15.4	328	6.24	–
2019	not published	15,757	49,153	52,323	3,215	16.3	301	5.47	98%
2018	not published	12,361	38,601	38,525	2,334	16.5	321	7.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.11	16.3	−50%	349 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.22	17.5	−53%	294 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.34	19.4	−62%	192 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	9.78	19.1	−49%	307 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	9.22	17.9	−48%	264 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.24	17.6	−65%	97 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.47	18.9	−71%	16 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.95	20.2	−61%	135 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.