Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL VANDA

IMO: 9631993
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 101,081 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 114,296 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

341

Container median 165 kg/nm (+106%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−52%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

129.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,645 t

CO₂ emitted

30,077 t

Distance sailed

28,296 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,790 h

75 days, 20% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 278 kg/nm · median 177 (+57%)

78.8Ranks 1,850 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 60% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−47%)

7.22Ranks 417 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU29%
Into the EU65%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

9,394 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

788 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL VANDA
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL VANDA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL VANDA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.8 kn	−10%	−26%	−44%	−0%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−9%	−3%	+238%	−7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	−20%	−5%	−29%	−20%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+30%	+35%	+145%	−6%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	+10%	−5%	−72%	+126%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.9 kn	−4%	−14%	+11%	−8%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−15%	−21%	+35%	−36%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	14,977	46,783	53,817	3,852	14.0	278	8.60	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	29,618	92,387	95,559	5,675	16.8	310	8.62	98%
2023	not published	9,645	30,077	28,296	1,790	15.8	341	9.30	97%
2022	not published	17,081	53,298	40,091	2,997	13.4	426	11.6	98%
2021	not published	5,379	16,821	16,391	1,277	12.8	328	12.4	84%
2020	not published	17,682	55,415	59,410	3,984	14.9	298	5.49	–
2019	not published	16,572	51,743	53,556	3,196	16.8	309	5.94	97%
2018	not published	14,425	45,017	39,706	2,200	18.0	363	9.27	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.60	16.3	−47%	417 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.62	17.5	−51%	338 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	9.30	19.4	−52%	334 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.6	19.1	−39%	454 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.4	17.9	−31%	495 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.49	17.6	−69%	20 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.94	18.9	−69%	29 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	9.27	20.2	−54%	210 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.