Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL SINGAPURA

IMO: 9632002
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 104,505 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 133,979 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

344

Container median 186 kg/nm (+85%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.07

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−55%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,384 t

CO₂ emitted

23,206 t

Distance sailed

21,463 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,649 h

69 days, 19% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 294 kg/nm · median 177 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,947 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−46%)

7.22Ranks 435 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU36%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

6,897 t

93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,550 t

6.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL SINGAPURA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL SINGAPURA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL SINGAPURA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−2%	−9%	−19%	+8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−6%	+7%	+153%	−7%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−4%	+2%	+96%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−4%	+1%	−17%	+14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	−2%	−20%	−62%	+22%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+12%	+25%	+66%	+3%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	−2%	−19%	−35%	−35%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	20,950	65,407	71,203	4,692	15.2	294	8.79	97%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	26,482	82,611	88,385	5,372	16.5	300	8.15	98%
2023	not published	11,126	34,797	34,930	2,421	14.4	319	8.75	97%
2022	not published	5,905	18,518	17,839	1,306	13.7	331	9.16	95%
2021	not published	7,384	23,206	21,463	1,649	13.0	344	8.07	93%
2020	not published	19,974	62,483	56,645	3,552	15.9	353	6.62	–
2019	not published	10,780	33,696	34,132	2,390	14.3	316	6.40	98%
2018	not published	17,083	53,318	52,859	3,051	17.3	323	9.79	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.79	16.3	−46%	435 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.15	17.5	−53%	286 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.75	19.4	−55%	304 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	9.16	19.1	−52%	261 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	8.07	17.9	−55%	194 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.62	17.6	−62%	137 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.40	18.9	−66%	63 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	9.79	20.2	−52%	251 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.