Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL MERLION

IMO: 9632014
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,628 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 164,091 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

311

Container median 174 kg/nm (+78%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.91

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−69%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

125.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,556 t

CO₂ emitted

39,222 t

Distance sailed

40,444 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,409 h

100 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 266 kg/nm · median 177 (+50%)

78.8Ranks 1,773 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 13.3 (+8%)

9.1Faster than 67% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−47%)

7.22Ranks 424 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU12%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

12,129 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,349 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL MERLION
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL MERLION
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL MERLION
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−15%	−25%	−30%	+1%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−2%	+6%	+77%	+6%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.6 kn	−7%	+12%	+49%	−13%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+13%	+9%	−9%	+26%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	−9%	−24%	+93%	+19%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+6%	−1%	−54%	+5%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−11%	−14%	−25%	−32%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	15,889	49,567	59,853	4,162	14.4	266	8.66	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	26,655	83,113	85,831	5,251	16.3	311	8.57	98%
2023	not published	15,275	47,648	48,394	3,178	15.2	316	8.12	97%
2022	not published	11,022	34,542	32,528	2,577	12.6	339	9.34	96%
2021	not published	10,768	33,623	35,845	2,740	13.1	300	7.39	97%
2020	not published	6,118	19,175	18,549	1,184	15.7	330	6.20	–
2019	not published	12,556	39,222	40,444	2,409	16.8	311	5.91	97%
2018	not published	18,881	58,947	54,137	3,111	17.4	349	8.63	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.66	16.3	−47%	424 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.57	17.5	−51%	330 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.12	19.4	−58%	256 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	9.34	19.1	−51%	272 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	7.39	17.9	−59%	162 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.20	17.6	−65%	92 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.91	18.9	−69%	27 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.63	20.2	−57%	171 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.