Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL FULLERTON

IMO: 9632026
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 106,740 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 113,775 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

364

Container median 178 kg/nm (+105%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−48%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

131.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,988 t

CO₂ emitted

21,874 t

Distance sailed

19,226 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,278 h

53 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 278 kg/nm · median 177 (+57%)

78.8Ranks 1,848 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 13.3 (+15%)

9.1Faster than 81% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 349 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU34%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

6,625 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,175 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL FULLERTON
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL FULLERTON
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL FULLERTON
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−14%	−12%	+108%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+12%	+10%	−39%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−21%	−20%	+229%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.5 kn	+1%	+22%	−18%	−17%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	+22%	+2%	−61%	+114%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−4%	−11%	+50%	+2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	22,091	68,867	79,555	5,199	15.3	278	8.11	98%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	12,402	38,660	38,319	2,581	14.8	324	8.37	97%
2023	not published	18,181	56,681	63,168	4,158	15.2	288	7.88	98%
2022	not published	6,988	21,874	19,226	1,278	15.0	364	10.0	95%
2021	not published	8,407	26,254	23,420	1,871	12.5	359	12.0	86%
2020	not published	17,698	55,475	60,217	4,007	15.0	294	5.60	–
2019	not published	12,296	38,382	40,177	2,479	16.2	306	5.50	97%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.11	16.3	−50%	349 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.37	17.5	−52%	308 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.88	19.4	−59%	235 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.0	19.1	−48%	319 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.0	17.9	−33%	470 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.60	17.6	−68%	23 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.50	18.9	−71%	18 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.