Navalyze · Container · Ship

MUNKEBO MAERSK

IMO: 9632117
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 146,555 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Munkebo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 154,042 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

330

Container median 182 kg/nm (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−67%)

Average speed

17.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

138.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

25,630 t

CO₂ emitted

80,050 t

Distance sailed

77,562 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,435 h

185 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 314 kg/nm · median 177 (+77%)

78.8Ranks 2,042 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.67 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−59%)

7.22Ranks 148 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU41%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

25,630 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,409 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MUNKEBO MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MUNKEBO MAERSK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MUNKEBO MAERSK
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−1%	−7%	−33%	+10%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.2 kn	+13%	+40%	+119%	+5%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.8 kn	−9%	+5%	+54%	−30%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+10%	+2%	−55%	+72%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.0 kn	−10%	−27%	+0%	−18%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−3%	−11%	−21%	−4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−2%	−6%	−15%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	16,720	52,099	53,297	3,390	15.7	314	6.67	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	25,401	79,105	79,776	4,799	16.6	318	6.08	99%
2023	not published	10,299	32,172	36,448	2,718	13.4	283	5.79	97%
2022	not published	7,370	22,979	23,642	2,047	11.6	312	8.28	97%
2021	not published	14,744	46,027	52,254	4,191	12.5	282	4.81	–
2020	not published	16,278	50,800	52,029	3,358	15.5	313	5.87	100%
2019	not published	21,177	66,091	65,563	3,908	16.8	323	6.10	100%
2018	not published	25,630	80,050	77,562	4,435	17.5	330	6.70	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.67	16.3	−59%	148 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.08	17.5	−65%	73 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	5.79	19.4	−70%	36 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.28	19.1	−57%	224 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	4.81	17.9	−73%	4 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.87	17.6	−67%	52 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.10	18.9	−68%	46 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.70	20.2	−67%	36 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.