Navalyze · Container · Ship

METTE MAERSK

IMO: 9632155
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 138,251 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Romo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 170,717 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

305

Container median 165 kg/nm (+85%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−71%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

109.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,738 t

CO₂ emitted

39,734 t

Distance sailed

41,711 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,785 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 325 kg/nm · median 177 (+84%)

78.8Ranks 2,084 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.33 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−55%)

7.22Ranks 238 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU17%
Into the EU69%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

12,318 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,323 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

METTE MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

METTE MAERSK
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

METTE MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	−48%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+2%	+7%	+114%	−0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	+3%	+12%	−3%	+7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−1%	−13%	−7%	−0%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	+38%	−12%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−0%	+4%	−34%	+3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−2%	−15%	+4%	−9%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	15,094	47,046	46,425	2,955	15.7	325	7.33	98%
2024	Maersk A/S	27,701	85,931	89,312	5,643	15.8	310	5.57	99%
2023	not published	12,738	39,734	41,711	2,785	15.0	305	5.58	97%
2022	not published	12,777	39,844	42,895	3,127	13.7	298	5.21	96%
2021	not published	13,955	43,489	46,157	2,955	15.6	302	5.23	–
2020	not published	9,917	30,065	33,430	2,200	15.2	297	5.94	100%
2019	not published	15,035	46,836	50,622	3,456	14.6	297	5.77	100%
2018	not published	14,716	46,040	48,528	2,878	16.9	303	6.37	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	7.33	16.3	−55%	238 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	5.57	17.5	−68%	36 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	5.58	19.4	−71%	25 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	5.21	19.1	−73%	7 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	5.23	17.9	−71%	11 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.94	17.6	−66%	63 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.77	18.9	−69%	23 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.37	20.2	−68%	19 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.