Navalyze · Container · Ship

MATHILDE MAERSK

IMO: 9632179
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 125,110 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Dragor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 162,220 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

331

Container median 172 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.35

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−64%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

114.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,984 t

CO₂ emitted

62,283 t

Distance sailed

60,463 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,205 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 277 kg/nm · median 177 (+56%)

78.8Ranks 1,846 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 87% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−58%)

7.22Ranks 174 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU42%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

19,984 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,333 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MATHILDE MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MATHILDE MAERSK
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MATHILDE MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−22%	−26%	−17%	−2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+16%	+30%	+62%	+15%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−6%	+4%	−16%	−13%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−2%	−23%	−1%	+7%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+1%	+20%	+13%	+3%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	+8%	−4%	+31%	+3%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−5%	−11%	−17%	−17%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	21,028	65,483	75,965	4,818	15.8	277	6.89	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	32,649	101,651	91,809	5,529	16.6	356	7.01	99%
2023	not published	17,494	54,498	56,839	3,846	14.8	308	6.07	98%
2022	not published	22,025	68,618	67,343	5,028	13.4	327	6.97	98%
2021	not published	22,709	70,042	68,047	3,994	17.0	334	6.54	–
2020	not published	19,984	62,283	60,463	4,205	14.4	331	6.35	100%
2019	not published	14,018	43,661	46,013	2,847	16.2	305	6.17	100%
2018	not published	17,773	55,447	55,458	3,215	17.2	321	7.45	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.89	16.3	−58%	174 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	7.01	17.5	−60%	154 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.07	19.4	−69%	65 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.97	19.1	−64%	137 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	6.54	17.9	−63%	102 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.35	17.6	−64%	117 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.17	18.9	−67%	52 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.45	20.2	−63%	95 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.