Navalyze · Container · Ship

COLOMBIA EXPRESS

IMO: 9635664
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 42,998 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.27 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MARY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

234

Container median 165 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−18%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+29%)

Fuel per day at sea

95.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,479 t

CO₂ emitted

35,867 t

Distance sailed

49,051 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,885 h

120 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 147 kg/nm · median 177 (−17%)

78.8Ranks 901 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 40% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 651 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU5%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,266 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COLOMBIA EXPRESS
Container median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COLOMBIA EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COLOMBIA EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	−16%	−31%	+19%	−6%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−25%	−33%	+20%	−28%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−2%	+3%	−33%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+2%	−3%	+10%	+13%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+9%	+28%	−7%	−7%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+12%	+5%	+31%	+4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−3%	−7%	+568%	−9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	10,199	31,871	69,599	5,489	12.7	147	10.7	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	10,258	32,101	58,675	3,826	15.3	175	11.4	–
2023	not published	11,479	35,867	49,051	2,885	17.0	234	15.8	–
2022	not published	17,487	54,917	73,126	4,525	16.2	239	15.8	–
2021	not published	15,537	48,747	66,319	3,895	17.0	234	14.1	–
2020	not published	15,289	48,227	71,119	4,924	14.4	215	15.1	–
2019	not published	10,461	32,681	54,261	3,543	15.3	193	14.5	–
2018	not published	1,608	5,040	8,128	505	16.1	198	15.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	10.7	16.3	−35%	651 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	11.4	17.5	−35%	555 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.8	19.4	−18%	777 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	15.8	19.1	−17%	759 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	14.1	17.9	−21%	639 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	15.1	17.6	−14%	739 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	14.5	18.9	−23%	610 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	15.9	20.2	−22%	597 of 1,705	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.