Navalyze · Container · Ship

NICARAGUA EXPRESS

IMO: 9635676
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 46,273 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALEXANDRA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 45,937 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

221

Container median 165 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−23%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

83.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,737 t

CO₂ emitted

46,038 t

Distance sailed

66,680 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,218 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 141 kg/nm · median 177 (−20%)

78.8Ranks 854 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 13.3 (+1%)

9.1Faster than 50% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−41%)

7.22Ranks 528 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU5%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,772 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NICARAGUA EXPRESS
Container median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NICARAGUA EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NICARAGUA EXPRESS
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	−35%	−41%	+95%	−37%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−3%	−8%	−40%	+1%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+1%	−1%	−5%	+12%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−1%	−5%	+1%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	−3%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+16%	+38%	+248%	+12%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	11,007	34,475	78,096	5,848	13.4	141	9.54	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	8,647	26,981	40,144	2,694	14.9	215	15.2	–
2023	not published	14,737	46,038	66,680	4,218	15.8	221	15.0	–
2022	not published	15,344	48,177	70,283	4,335	16.2	218	13.4	–
2021	not published	15,427	48,404	69,613	4,143	16.8	222	14.4	–
2020	not published	15,081	47,558	71,877	4,309	16.7	210	14.2	–
2019	not published	3,744	11,667	20,635	1,476	14.0	182	12.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9.54	16.3	−41%	528 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	15.2	17.5	−13%	829 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.0	19.4	−23%	731 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	13.4	19.1	−30%	588 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	14.4	17.9	−20%	671 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	14.2	17.6	−19%	681 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	12.6	18.9	−33%	485 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.