Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BW PAVILION VANDA

IMO: 9640437
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

222

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.17

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−22%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,949 t

CO₂ emitted

27,483 t

Distance sailed

44,902 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,932 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 202 kg/nm · median 190 (+6%)

152Ranks 234 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 60% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.47 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−9%)

5.06Ranks 163 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU54%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

305 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BW PAVILION VANDA
LNG carrier median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BW PAVILION VANDA
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BW PAVILION VANDA
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+59%	+70%	+539%	+190%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 59%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−30%	−32%	−75%	−88%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+4.8 kn	−19%	+22%	−54%	+149%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+2%	−16%	−41%	−10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	−10%	−19%	−21%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	3,900	10,432	19,291	1,302	14.8	202	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	385	1,029	3,017	218	13.9	128	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,237	6,177	12,228	863	14.2	183	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6,025	17,225	26,638	2,829	9.4	226	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,949	27,483	44,902	3,932	11.4	222	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13,976	38,629	56,876	4,458	12.8	246	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	6.47	7.12	−9%	163 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	2.23	7.39	−70%	1 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	18.3	9.10	+101%	322 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.36	10.4	−29%	107 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8.17	10.5	−22%	103 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.10	10.7	−24%	56 of 267	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.