Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BW PAVILION LEEARA

IMO: 9640645
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.31 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: BW Fleet Management A/S · part of BW Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

255

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.54

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−31%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,863 t

CO₂ emitted

38,935 t

Distance sailed

54,279 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,199 h

217 days, 59% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 136 kg/nm · median 205 (−33%)

148Ranks 22 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.6 (−6%)

11.0Faster than 34% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 4.80 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−35%)

4.54Ranks 41 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU40%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,690 t

6.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BW PAVILION LEEARA
LNG carrier median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

BW PAVILION LEEARA
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BW PAVILION LEEARA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	−34%	−41%	−63%	−37%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.0 kn	+4%	+20%	−44%	−14%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+0.5 kn	−12%	−8%	−10%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−11%	+7%	+45%	+19%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−7%	+10%	+160%	−2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	1,977	5,305	14,497	1,058	13.7	136	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,234	23,230	39,640	2,622	15.1	208	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,084	40,011	70,382	5,389	13.1	200	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	17,867	49,578	78,544	6,257	12.6	228	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13,863	38,935	54,279	5,199	10.4	255	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	5,711	16,305	20,843	2,362	8.8	274	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	4.80	7.39	−35%	41 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.64	9.10	−16%	137 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8.88	10.4	−14%	156 of 379	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.95	10.7	−16%	76 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7.54	10.9	−31%	44 of 248	DNV	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	7.67	10.9	−30%	37 of 197	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.