Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- BW Groupyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| BW Group | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 78 |
| CO₂ emitted | 672 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 124 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 21 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4
- BW Group9.1 (+23% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | 22 | 9.1 | +23% | 227 | 12.0 | 2,212 | 2.2% | 21 |
| Segment median | 7.4 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- BW Group7.0 (−13% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | 31 | 7.0 | −13% | 99 | 10.7 | 1,362 | 6.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8
- BW Group62.4 (+74% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | 19 | 62.4 | +74% | 56 | 10.8 | 3,094 | 6.5% | – |
| Segment median | 35.8 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- BW Group5.2 (−35% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | 5 | 5.2 | −35% | 83 | 11.0 | 2,213 | 2.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- BW Group11.3 (−32% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | 1 | 11.3 | −32% | 114 | 10.4 | 2,684 | 12.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Group | DNV (63), Lloyd's Register (15) | 19% | 54% | 81% | 0% |
BW Group: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNG ENUGULNG | 9266994 | LNG carrier | 17.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +135% | 8.4 | 20,623 t | €314k |
| BERGE ARZEWLNG | 9256597 | LNG carrier | 16.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +124% | 9.1 | 5,249 t | €86k |
| LNG OYOLNG | 9267003 | LNG carrier | 16.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +121% | 6.5 | 17,905 t | €272k |
| HAFNIA LARVIK | 9946465 | Oil tanker | 54.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +114% | 8.5 | 1,210 t | €26k |
| LNG BENUELNG | 9267015 | LNG carrier | 15.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +109% | 9.0 | 21,160 t | €320k |
| LNG RIVER ORASHILNG | 9266982 | LNG carrier | 11.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +59% | 11.2 | 13,779 t | €211k |
| BW MAGNOLIALNG | 9850666 | LNG carrier | 11.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +59% | 15.6 | 9,716 t | €148k |
| LNG LOKOJALNG | 9269960 | LNG carrier | 11.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +49% | 10.5 | 13,101 t | €201k |
| LNG IMOLNG | 9311581 | LNG carrier | 10.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +39% | 10.4 | 38,246 t | €581k |
| BW VAR | 9748227 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 48.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.1 | +38% | 14.7 | 4,720 t | €74k |
| BW ENN CRYSTAL SKYLNG | 9383900 | LNG carrier | 10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +37% | 16.2 | 49,217 t | €437k |
| HAFNIA THALASSA | 9800324 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +34% | 9.1 | 2,481 t | €41k |
| HAFNIA VALENTINO | 9692246 | Chemical tanker | 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | +32% | 10.4 | 9,991 t | €201k |
| BW OSAKA | 9836567 | Bulk carrier | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +25% | 10.7 | 2,625 t | €71k |
| LNG KANOLNG | 9311567 | LNG carrier | 9.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +25% | 13.5 | 7,258 t | €111k |
| BW ARIES | 9701786 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 18.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +23% | 14.3 | 7,894 t | €122k |
| LNG ONDOLNG | 9311579 | LNG carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +23% | 9.7 | 10,753 t | €167k |
| BW HELIOSLNG | 9873852 | LNG carrier | 8.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | +20% | 10.0 | 6,919 t | €107k |
| BW TUCANA | 9735658 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 17.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.0 | +18% | 15.1 | 2,955 t | €46k |
| EPIC SALINA | 9733569 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 75.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 65.9 | +15% | 7.3 | 4,743 t | €89k |
| HAFNIA YANGTZE | 9393096 | Oil tanker | 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +6% | 10.6 | 3,730 t | €61k |
| BW EGRET | 9607174 | Oil tanker | 10.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | +2% | 10.8 | 9,083 t | €164k |
| HAFNIA EXCELLENCE | 9735646 | Oil tanker | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +2% | 10.0 | 2,046 t | €31k |
| HAFNIA BOBCAT | 9694476 | Oil tanker | 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | 0% | 11.6 | 4,432 t | €77k |
| HAFNIA SHINANO | 9506069 | Oil tanker | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | −1% | 10.7 | 2,846 t | €44k |
| HAFNIA SWIFT | 9713844 | Oil tanker | 9.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | −2% | 8.1 | 873 t | €13k |
| HAFNIA PACIFIC | 9810226 | Oil tanker | 9.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.9 | −3% | 11.6 | 9,730 t | €165k |
| EPIC SARDINIA | 9733571 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 63.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 65.9 | −3% | 10.0 | 7,893 t | €137k |
| BW BRUSSELSLNG | 9368314 | LNG carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.4 | −3% | 14.4 | 8,748 t | €133k |
| HELENA KOSAN | 9342396 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 110 g CO₂/t·nm | 114 | −4% | 12.6 | 9,648 t | €219k |
30 of 79 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.