Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HAPPY LADY

IMO: 9644225
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,722 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,722 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

102.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.61

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+37%)

Average speed

8.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

777 t

CO₂ emitted

2,451 t

2,489 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,565 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

939 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 102.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+29%)

52.8Ranks 1,221 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 11.1 (−27%)

8.8Faster than 7% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.61 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+37%)

7.93Ranks 967 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU30%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU9%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,704 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HAPPY LADY
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HAPPY LADY
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAPPY LADY
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.4 kn	+30%	−16%	−60%	+86%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−6%	+5%	+253%	+18%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−9%	−14%	−65%	−38%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022	−0.3 kn	+16%	+13%	−55%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.5 kn	−9%	+45%	+52%	−36%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−9%	+5%	−28%	+95%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	777	2,451	7,565	939	8.1	102.7	20.61	–
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	1,475	4,648	18,718	1,501	12.5	78.8	11.07	–
2023	not published	445	1,404	5,299	474	11.2	84.0	9.41	–
2022	not published	1,417	4,481	15,297	1,296	11.8	92.6	15.26	–
2020	not published	2,719	8,485	34,002	2,818	12.1	80.0	13.40	–
2019	not published	1,972	6,166	22,443	2,950	7.6	87.9	20.83	–
2018	not published	3,016	9,472	31,089	4,751	6.5	97.0	10.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	20.61	15.04	+37%	967 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited	11.07	16.73	−34%	324 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	9.41	16.23	−42%	156 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	15.26	16.06	−5%	641 of 1,409	RINA	B
2020	not published	13.40	16.16	−17%	436 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	20.83	17.32	+20%	836 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	10.68	17.14	−38%	215 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.