Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BAGHEERA

IMO: 9670949
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,542 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORD GARDENIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ishima Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,542 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

99.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+2%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,256 t

CO₂ emitted

10,339 t

10,499 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,855 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,324 h

139 days, 38% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 99.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+24%)

52.8Ranks 1,164 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 11.1 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 22% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+2%)

7.93Ranks 750 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU16%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU15%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,693 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BAGHEERA
Chemical tanker median

0.0500.01,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAGHEERA
Chemical tanker median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BAGHEERA
Chemical tanker median

12.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+4.0 kn	−8%	+55%	+14%	−19%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.9 kn	+14%	−32%	−14%	+11%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+8.9 kn	−93%	−29%	+730%	−11%	8.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 93%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−8.4 kn	+1,746%	+85%	−88%	+39%	8.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 1,746%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−3%	+12%	−15%	+2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−26%	−13%	+71%	−26%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−13%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Ishima Pte. Ltd.	3,256	10,339	32,855	3,324	9.9	99.1	15.32	–
2024	Ishima Pte Ltd	3,115	9,795	28,866	4,914	5.9	107.9	19.03	–
2023	not published	3,180	10,051	33,557	3,438	9.8	94.8	17.19	–
2022	not published	5,589	17,608	4,043	4,312	0.9	1,382.4	19.28	–
2021	not published	2,473	7,816	33,017	3,541	9.3	74.9	13.86	–
2020	not published	2,987	9,501	38,677	4,764	8.1	77.2	13.53	–
2019	not published	2,374	7,485	22,611	3,292	6.9	105.0	18.23	–
2018	not published	2,824	8,858	25,953	3,816	6.8	108.8	22.30	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ishima Pte. Ltd.	15.32	15.04	+2%	750 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	Ishima Pte Ltd	19.03	16.73	+14%	739 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	17.19	16.23	+6%	694 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	19.28	16.06	+20%	850 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	13.86	16.69	−17%	475 of 1,343	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	13.53	16.16	−16%	450 of 1,312	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	18.23	17.32	+5%	715 of 1,321	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	22.30	17.14	+30%	881 of 1,294	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.