Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Ishima Pte Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Ishima Pte Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 47 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 99 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 10.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Ishima Pte Ltd6.4 (−62% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ishima Pte Ltd | 6 | 6.4 | −62% | 89 | 8.3 | 1,888 | 13.8% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Ishima Pte Ltd7.1 (−12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ishima Pte Ltd | 1 | 7.1 | −12% | 112 | 10.7 | 5,672 | 6.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ishima Pte Ltd | RINA (7) | 0% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
Ishima Pte Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAGHEERA | 9670949 | Chemical tanker | 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +15% | 5.9 | 9,795 t | €236k |
| TABLE BAY | 9974979 | Chemical tanker | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −11% | 10.0 | 6,487 t | €110k |
| PHILOTIMOS | 9793997 | Oil tanker | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.4 | −16% | 10.7 | 21,316 t | €188k |
| HEROLDS BAY | 9967251 | Chemical tanker | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −25% | 12.1 | 2,010 t | €34k |
| VICTORIA BAY | 9974981 | Chemical tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −30% | 11.6 | 2,035 t | €34k |
| MOSSEL BAY | 9970375 | Chemical tanker | 5.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −32% | 11.7 | 1,361 t | €21k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.