Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

INEOS INTREPID

IMO: 9685449
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,117 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: JS INEOS INTREPID

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,117 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.8 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.43

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (−0%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,611 t

CO₂ emitted

13,867 t

14,094 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

54,991 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,906 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+3%)

49.8Ranks 194 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 12.6 (+12%)

8.8Faster than 77% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.43 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (−0%)

14.36Ranks 177 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU54%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,014 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

INEOS INTREPID
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

INEOS INTREPID
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

INEOS INTREPID
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−1%	−4%	−23%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+0%	−1%	−17%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	+1%	+24%	+99%	−0%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	−5%	−20%	−43%	−11%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−5%	+8%	−25%	−11%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+3%	+8%	+8%	+10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+10%	−4%	−10%	+17%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Seapeak Maritime Limited	4,611	13,867	54,991	3,906	14.1	83.8	35.43	–
2024	Seapeak Maritime Limited	6,082	18,229	71,671	4,942	14.5	84.8	36.60	–
2023	not published	7,276	21,694	85,868	5,880	14.6	84.7	31.00	–
2022	not published	3,611	10,770	43,244	3,634	11.9	83.5	31.05	–
2021	not published	6,617	19,908	75,645	5,350	14.1	87.5	34.78	–
2020	not published	9,291	27,772	100,657	8,094	12.4	92.3	39.25	–
2019	not published	8,414	25,163	93,481	7,933	11.8	90.0	35.57	–
2018	not published	8,452	25,098	103,692	7,639	13.6	81.5	30.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seapeak Maritime Limited	35.43	35.56	−0%	177 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Seapeak Maritime Limited	36.60	35.82	+2%	160 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	31.00	41.77	−26%	122 of 330	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022	not published	31.05	42.53	−27%	130 of 348	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2021	not published	34.78	46.91	−26%	115 of 323	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2020	not published	39.25	42.29	−7%	161 of 339	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2019	not published	35.57	45.85	−22%	135 of 331	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2018	not published	30.43	53.11	−43%	86 of 297	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.