Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CORAL STAR

IMO
9685499
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
1,070 t
Port of registry
Rotterdam
Technical efficiency
EEXI 22.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,070 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
66.0 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−19%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
198
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+456%)
Average speed
9.6 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−24%)
Fuel per day at sea
15.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,098 t
CO₂ emitted
6,728 t
6,831 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
31,794 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,302 h
138 days, 38% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 66.0 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−19%)
49.8Ranks 78 of 355, lowest first124.4
Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 12.6 (−24%)
8.8Faster than 14% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 197.77 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+456%)
14.36Ranks 341 of 355, lowest first120.18
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports88%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU12%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,728 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
11.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CORAL STAR
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • CORAL STAR
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CORAL STAR
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.5 kn−18%−13%+48%−24%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+1.2 kn+22%+41%−31%+75%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.5 kn−3%+4%+3%−6%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.2 kn+7%−8%−17%+5%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.5 kn+50%+42%−6%+48%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.6 kn−54%−23%+33%−54%3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.3 kn+35%+26%−11%+50%Same speed, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.2,0986,72831,7943,3029.666.0197.77–
2024Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.1,7285,53321,4902,3519.180.4259.44–
2023not published2,0516,23631,0123,9277.966.1148.36–
2022not published2,0436,18530,0714,0877.467.9157.62–
2021not published2,3066,94336,3594,2248.663.4150.10–
2020not published1,6405,25838,8174,2779.142.2101.56–
2019LNGnot published2,6607,82629,1085,3295.591.4222.47–
2018LNGnot published2,2206,41632,8175,6105.867.7148.61–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.197.7735.56+456%341 of 355DNVB+C
2024Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.259.4435.82+624%304 of 306DNVB+C
2023not published148.3641.77+255%309 of 330DNVB+C
2022not published157.6242.53+271%337 of 348DNVB+C
2021not published150.1046.91+220%306 of 323DNVB
2020not published101.5642.29+140%275 of 339DNVB
2019LNGnot published222.4745.85+385%325 of 331Bureau VeritasB
2018LNGnot published148.6153.11+180%273 of 297Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.