Navalyze · Container · Ship

MEXICO EXPRESS

IMO: 9686900
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 48,683 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UASC BUBIYAN, ALEXIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 48,683 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

140.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−45%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,360 t

CO₂ emitted

35,488 t

36,046 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

80,638 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,088 h

254 days, 69% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 140.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−20%)

78.8Ranks 854 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 48% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 468 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU48%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,548 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−32%	−38%	+68%	−31%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	−13%	−22%	−34%	−16%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−3%	−6%	+7%	+2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−10%	+5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+12%	+15%	+8%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	+77%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+3%	+12%	+53%	+21%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	11,360	35,488	80,638	6,088	13.2	140.9	9.04	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,925	31,004	47,893	3,288	14.6	207.2	13.08	–
2023	not published	17,279	54,086	72,607	4,485	16.2	238.0	15.51	–
2022	not published	16,684	52,391	67,731	4,064	16.7	246.3	15.20	–
2021	not published	17,595	55,097	75,105	4,407	17.0	234.3	14.47	–
2020	not published	14,580	45,982	69,441	4,203	16.5	210.0	14.26	–
2019	not published	7,395	23,101	39,263	2,360	16.6	188.3	16.27	–
2018	not published	4,678	14,587	25,628	1,677	15.3	182.6	13.40	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9.04	16.30	−45%	468 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.08	17.52	−25%	693 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.51	19.40	−20%	763 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	15.20	19.13	−21%	715 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	14.47	17.90	−19%	677 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	14.26	17.58	−19%	688 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	16.27	18.88	−14%	735 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	13.40	20.22	−34%	455 of 1,705	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.