Navalyze · Container · Ship

MEXICO EXPRESS

IMO: 9686900
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 48,683 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UASC BUBIYAN, ALEXIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,698 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

234

Container median 186 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−19%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

95.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,595 t

CO₂ emitted

55,097 t

Distance sailed

75,105 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,407 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 141 kg/nm · median 177 (−20%)

78.8Ranks 854 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 48% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 468 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU8%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,198 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MEXICO EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−32%	−38%	+68%	−31%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	−13%	−22%	−34%	−16%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−3%	−6%	+7%	+2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−10%	+5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+12%	+15%	+8%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	+77%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+3%	+12%	+53%	+21%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	11,360	35,488	80,638	6,088	13.2	141	9.04	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,925	31,004	47,893	3,288	14.6	207	13.1	–
2023	not published	17,279	54,086	72,607	4,485	16.2	238	15.5	–
2022	not published	16,684	52,391	67,731	4,064	16.7	246	15.2	–
2021	not published	17,595	55,097	75,105	4,407	17.0	234	14.5	–
2020	not published	14,580	45,982	69,441	4,203	16.5	210	14.3	–
2019	not published	7,395	23,101	39,263	2,360	16.6	188	16.3	–
2018	not published	4,678	14,587	25,628	1,677	15.3	183	13.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9.04	16.3	−45%	468 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.1	17.5	−25%	693 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.5	19.4	−20%	763 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	15.2	19.1	−21%	715 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	14.5	17.9	−19%	677 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	14.3	17.6	−19%	688 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	16.3	18.9	−14%	735 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	13.4	20.2	−34%	455 of 1,705	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.