Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE MANHATTAN

IMO: 9689615
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Kobe
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MANHATTAN BRIDGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: "K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD · part of K Line

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 118,412 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

259

Container median 165 kg/nm (+57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.84

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−65%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

81.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,546 t

CO₂ emitted

26,771 t

Distance sailed

33,053 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,521 h

105 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 259 kg/nm · median 165 (+57%)

77.6Ranks 1,551 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.2 (−1%)

10.0Faster than 49% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.84 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−65%)

7.34Ranks 139 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU2%
Into the EU86%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,108 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE MANHATTAN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ONE MANHATTAN
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE MANHATTAN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−10%	−2%	+10%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	+8%	+32%	+41%	+6%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.5 kn	−6%	−30%	+37%	−5%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−10%	−11%	+27%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+13%	+11%	−62%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+0%	−3%	+15%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	8,449	26,362	36,324	2,534	14.3	233	–	–
2023	not published	8,546	26,771	33,053	2,521	13.1	259	6.84	–
2022	not published	5,620	17,654	23,514	2,188	10.7	239	6.43	–
2021	not published	4,378	13,775	17,125	1,203	14.2	256	6.79	–
2020	not published	3,828	12,072	13,535	938	14.4	283	9.80	–
2019	not published	8,912	27,785	35,569	2,418	14.7	251	8.40	–
2018	not published	7,723	24,083	30,918	2,023	15.3	250	7.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	6.84	19.4	−65%	139 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	6.43	19.1	−66%	77 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	6.79	17.9	−62%	126 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	9.80	17.6	−44%	356 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	8.40	18.9	−56%	218 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	7.76	20.2	−62%	118 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.