Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

K Lineyour view

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

	K Line
Ships	49
CO₂ emitted	838 kt
Fuel per mile	142 kg/nm
Average speed	14.6 kn
CO₂ at berth	0.3%
Ships burning LNG	1
Main segment	Container

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5

K Line10.4 (−41% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
K Line	16	10.4	−41%	246	15.2	4,070	0.0%	–
Segment median		17.5	0%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.3

K Line41.7 (−25% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
K Line	24	41.7	−25%	107	15.2	3,350	0.7%	–
Segment median		55.3	0%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

K Line6.0 (−26% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
K Line	7	6.0	−26%	89	10.2	993	0.0%	–
Segment median		8.1	0%

Ro-ro

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5

K Line32.0 (−67% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
K Line	1	32.0	−67%	86	17.9	12	0.0%	1
Segment median		97.5	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
K Line	ClassNK (49)	2%	16%	94%	0%

K Line: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
SIRIUS HIGHWAY	9757981	Vehicle carrier	41.7 g CO₂/t·nm	38.0	+10%	15.0	22,534 t	€356k
CANADIAN HIGHWAY	9574066	Vehicle carrier	44.8 g CO₂/t·nm	45.6	−2%	16.3	13,241 t	€189k
ONE HANNOVER	9302138	Container	10.4 g CO₂/t·nm	10.7	−3%	15.2	47,597 t	€730k
BRITAIN BAY	9615729	Bulk carrier	6.2 g CO₂/t·nm	6.7	−7%	9.7	1,355 t	€21k
APOLLON HIGHWAY	9728083	Vehicle carrier	33.6 g CO₂/t·nm	38.0	−11%	14.8	15,619 t	€251k
CLIFTON BAY	9615743	Bulk carrier	5.8 g CO₂/t·nm	6.7	−14%	10.4	4,289 t	€66k
PONTUS HIGHWAYLNG	9974113	Ro-ro	32.0 g CO₂/t·nm	51.9	−38%	17.9	51 t	€750

30 of 49 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.