Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SK RESOLUTE

IMO: 9693173
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SK shipping Co Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

205

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.16

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−31%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,904 t

CO₂ emitted

45,570 t

Distance sailed

77,410 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,283 h

220 days, 60% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 190 (−5%)

152Ranks 144 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 14.4 (+9%)

11.2Faster than 86% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.39 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+18%)

5.06Ranks 241 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU49%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

788 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SK RESOLUTE
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SK RESOLUTE
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SK RESOLUTE
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+2%	−6%	+80%	+69%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−6%	+4%	−58%	−28%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−9%	−4%	−34%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+1%	−10%	+143%	+36%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+7.1 kn	−26%	+32%	−35%	−48%	7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−2%	+11%	+516%	+17%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	SK shipping Co Ltd	6,989	19,162	38,833	2,480	15.7	180	–	–
2024LNG	SK shipping Co Ltd	3,793	10,285	21,557	1,270	17.0	176	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,496	26,595	50,829	3,296	15.4	187	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	15,904	45,570	77,410	5,283	14.7	205	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6,492	18,005	31,816	1,947	16.3	204	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13,410	37,288	48,613	5,297	9.2	276	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	2,212	6,151	7,891	969	8.1	280	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	SK shipping Co Ltd	8.39	7.12	+18%	241 of 386	Korean Register	A+C
2024LNG	SK shipping Co Ltd	4.97	7.39	−33%	49 of 312	Korean Register	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.90	9.10	−24%	103 of 355	Korean Register	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.16	10.4	−31%	94 of 379	Korean Register	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5.25	10.5	−50%	20 of 289	Korean Register	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10.1	10.9	−7%	101 of 248	Korean Register	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	8.63	10.9	−21%	45 of 197	Korean Register	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.