Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK BAHAMAS

IMO: 9697026
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,869 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDSERENA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,096 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Container median 178 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−8%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,626 t

CO₂ emitted

23,846 t

Distance sailed

74,956 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,991 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−44%)

78.8Ranks 521 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 62% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+46%)

7.22Ranks 1,517 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU53%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

7,519 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

341 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK BAHAMAS
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK BAHAMAS
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK BAHAMAS
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	−36%	+31%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−10%	−15%	−25%	−1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+7%	+3%	+6%	+5%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−3%	−7%	+105%	−28%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+0.7 kn	−18%	−14%	−31%	−34%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+1%	+6%	+78%	+31%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	3,766	11,683	38,095	2,703	14.1	98.8	23.8	98%
2024	Maersk A/S	5,838	18,265	59,618	4,372	13.6	97.9	18.3	99%
2023	not published	8,709	27,190	79,785	5,542	14.4	109	18.5	99%
2022	not published	7,626	23,846	74,956	4,991	15.0	102	17.6	99%
2021	not published	3,834	12,016	36,638	2,323	15.8	105	24.5	–
2019	not published	6,761	21,091	52,821	3,502	15.1	128	37.2	100%
2018	not published	3,742	11,706	29,618	2,065	14.3	126	28.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	23.8	16.3	+46%	1,517 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	18.3	17.5	+4%	1,023 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	18.5	19.4	−5%	900 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	17.6	19.1	−8%	841 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	24.5	17.9	+37%	1,167 of 1,781	ABS	C
2019	not published	37.2	18.9	+97%	1,380 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	28.4	20.2	+41%	1,137 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.