Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE

IMO: 9699189
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 74,392 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel
Former names: SAN CLEMENTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 31,541 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

253

Container median 182 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+24%)

Average speed

18.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,687 t

CO₂ emitted

42,734 t

Distance sailed

54,173 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,015 h

126 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 183 kg/nm · median 177 (+3%)

78.8Ranks 1,155 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 265 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU42%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

13,687 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

872 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+3%	+2%	+185%	−12%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+5.7 kn	+2%	+58%	+38%	−0%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+1%	+8%	−4%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.7 kn	−49%	−19%	+320%	−40%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 49%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−6.1 kn	+57%	−22%	−48%	−23%	6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 57%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−3.6 kn	−5%	−27%	−82%	+39%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−10%	−21%	+9%	−36%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Maersk A/S	15,705	48,151	86,072	5,434	15.8	183	7.52	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	5,336	16,617	30,226	1,880	16.1	177	8.52	100%
2023	not published	3,776	11,762	21,888	2,104	10.4	173	8.56	91%
2022	not published	3,925	12,271	22,891	2,365	9.7	172	10.1	95%
2021	not published	1,848	5,781	5,448	903	6.0	339	17.0	–
2020	not published	2,254	7,043	10,411	864	12.1	217	22.2	100%
2019	not published	13,516	42,191	59,223	3,777	15.7	228	15.9	100%
2018	not published	13,687	42,734	54,173	3,015	18.0	253	25.0	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Maersk A/S	7.52	16.3	−54%	265 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	8.52	17.5	−51%	326 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.56	19.4	−56%	289 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.1	19.1	−47%	329 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	17.0	17.9	−5%	839 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	22.2	17.6	+26%	1,105 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	15.9	18.9	−16%	719 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	25.0	20.2	+24%	1,042 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.