Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CLIPPER JUPITER

IMO: 9699505
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 13,506 t
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Solvang ASA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,506 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

110.7 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.60

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (−28%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,374 t

CO₂ emitted

13,655 t

13,869 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

39,493 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,941 h

123 days, 34% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 110.7 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+36%)

49.8Ranks 285 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 12.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 66% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (−28%)

14.36Ranks 136 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU48%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU4%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,419 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−4%	−47%	+10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+1%	−4%	−15%	+17%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	−5%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−5%	+1%	+82%	+31%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	−31%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+6.6 kn	−18%	+67%	+91%	−40%	6.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+7%	+1%	−13%	−20%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Solvang ASA	4,374	13,655	39,493	2,941	13.4	110.7	25.60	–
2024	Solvang ASA	8,375	26,117	74,346	5,395	13.8	112.7	23.36	–
2023	not published	9,817	30,609	87,754	6,076	14.4	111.9	19.91	–
2022	not published	9,703	30,244	92,641	6,607	14.0	104.7	21.33	–
2021	not published	5,602	17,479	50,963	3,876	13.1	109.9	16.23	–
2020	not published	8,145	25,389	73,366	5,639	13.0	111.0	16.90	–
2019	not published	5,174	16,150	38,424	5,984	6.4	134.7	28.27	–
2018	not published	5,578	17,405	44,276	6,535	6.8	126.0	35.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Solvang ASA	25.60	35.56	−28%	136 of 355	DNV	B
2024	Solvang ASA	23.36	35.82	−35%	102 of 306	DNV	B
2023	not published	19.91	41.77	−52%	77 of 330	DNV	B
2022	not published	21.33	42.53	−50%	80 of 348	DNV	B
2021	not published	16.23	46.91	−65%	29 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	16.90	42.29	−60%	45 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	28.27	45.85	−38%	95 of 331	DNV	B
2018	not published	35.50	53.11	−33%	106 of 297	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.